You are here: Foswiki>ALE Web>FrequentlyAskedQuestionsOnWheels (17 December 2009, willyonwheels)Edit Attach

Frequently Asked Questions


Networking

  1. How do I access shares on a windows computer?
  2. To be able to access shared files on a windows computer, you must first properly set up the sharing on the windows box. In Linux the Samba suite takes care of the SMB/CIFS protocol used by windows file sharing. You must have this installed to be able to share files from your Linux machine using SMB or to access windows shares on another computer.

    If you have compiled support for the smbfs filesystem into your kernel then you can use the normal mount command. Note that most distributions do include smbfs in their default kernel. To mount the share you can then use:

    mount -t smbfs //Remote_Computer/Share_Name /Local_Mount_Point

    This assumes that the directory /Local_Mount_Point exists and that you have the permissions to use it. Also note that behind your back this uses the smbmount command to do the actual work.

    To view the shares or to do any operations other than mounting the share, you need to use the smbclient program included with Samba.For example, to view the shares available on a certain server use:

    smbclient -L //Remote_Computer

    For more information, see the man pages for smbmount, smbclient, and the documentation included with Samba.

-- MichaelGolden - 12 Nov 2001

Here is some perl code which automagically scans for windows shares, mounts them, and explores them.

-- CharlesShapiro - 13 Nov 2001


Unix Command Line

  1. wget created a file named: -U on my ext2fs and I can't delete it. Any suggestions? When I try to: rm -rf "-U" I get invalid option -U ???
  2. The answer is in the man page for rm. Try "rm -- -U" If you're trying to delete a directory called "-U", try "rm -rf -- -U".
-- CharlesShapiro - 20 Dec 2001


KVM

  1. How have y'all set up a KVM switch?
  2. 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003

    2003

    Grady:
    Hey, y'all,

    I'm getting a second machine at home, where the space is scant & the wiring is not something I want to strain. I'd rather not get a second monitor, so I figure a KVM switch is the likeliest alternative. I've read through the discussions of KVM switches on the ALE list from last year & the previous, which have been real helpful to me, since I've never used a switch before.

    Since I suspect that such might be overkill just for two machines, I was wondering if anybody had suggestions for any alternatives, since none has occurred to me.

    Michael:
    Not overkill at all--it's an essential tool. Get a two port KVM switch. I use a linksys at home and it is great. I user a 4 port Belkin at work and it is good, too.

    It's a lot cheaper than a second monitor, and a heck of a lot cheaper than building a new room onto your house to hold all your computers.

    Mike P:
    If they are both running Linux you could just do a remote X session using GDM or XDM. Its been awhile since I have set this up, but I could easily go through it again on one of my machines at home and detail the steps I took if need be.

    Mike L:
    It wouldn't be overkill at all. Belkin and a few others make a 2 machine KVM that is pretty cheap, check out http://www.pricewatch.com and see who has one on sale.

    Side Note: Just remember that if you've got a Linux box and are running X, you need to do a ctrl-alt-f(x) then alt-f7 everytime you switch the KVM back to linux.

    Jason:
    I would actually really appreciate an overview on configuring remote X with GDM/XDM... If it's not too much trouble smile

    Michael:
    That must be system specific. I've never had to to that in 4 years of using a KVM with Linux.

    Mike L:
    Hmmm....weird. Might be somthing with slackware, since its the only distro I've used with KVM's. Although I do know at the last job I had, I know that the guys with redhat 7.x and Mandrake had to do it also. Wonder why you haven't run into that issue. What distro or setup are you using, etc...?

    Josh F:
    I wouldn't get a 2 port KVM unless they are substantially cheaper than the 4 port. I don't know about you, but I keep having more and more machines show up on my desk, and I kept an extra set of wires so I could hook up a machine when my [mom's | friend's ] machine broke and showed up on my doorstep

    On a somewhat related note, has anyone had any luck with USB KVM switches? I got one at work, but every time I switched away from the linux box, I lost the connection to the mouse and keyboard. It was a cheap KVM switch, so it may not have had the keyboard emulation that nicer switches have.

    Geoffrey:
    This has never been my experience in using a linksys 4 device kvm for about 8 years now.

    Just hit the button on the kvm and I'm on the other box, monitor, keyboard and mouse.

    Jeff:
    I've sworn by (and not AT) the larger Cybex units and I know they make smaller four-way units that I expect should work just as well.

    It's just that I've had booting problems with the fare available at the likes of CompUSA (Linksys, Belkin) and to me that's just a showstopper.

    Michael:
    On Thursday 13 February 2003 12:22 pm, Mike Lockhart wrote: > Hmmm....weird. Might be something with slackware, since its the only
    > distro I've used with KVM's. Although I do know at the last job I had,
    > I know that the guys with redhat 7.x and Mandrake had to do it also.
    > Wonder why you haven't run into that issue. What distro or setup are
    > you using, etc...?

    Mostly RedHat and Mandrake--often highly customized so as to be almost unrecognizable.

    I would guess that it might happen with certain display cards or KVMs, but none that I've used.

    Michael:
    I find the 2 port switches significantly more convienient to use. They usually have some very simple way of toggling between the two computers. The 4 ports are much less convenient. Of course, if you are going to have more than 2 computers a 2 port isn't much good for you.

    cfowler:
    I have many linux machines in my office and only one has a head.

    Unless you need X running on all machines, you can get away with just running one with head. The rest are headless. I also turn on serial console on all the other machines so If I do need to gain access to /dev/console, I can do so with a null-modem cable. Works really well.

    KVM still will not hurt. I've held off my purchase of a KVM due to the fact I still think they are a little pricey for home use. I'm cheap too.

    JasonD:
    On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 12:09:30PM -0500, Jason Vinson wrote: > I would actually really appreciate an overview on configuring remote X with GDM/XDM... If it's not too much trouble smile

    http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/XDMCP-HOWTO/index.html

    cfowler:
    This is mainly due to keyboard emulation issues. If you have 4 machines and the power goes off you may have problems booting back up. The main reason is the fact that even those devices support emulation, they can not service more than say 2 systems at a time with that emulation. So if all 4 machines look for keyboard at once then the Belkin may have issues servicing them at once. Problem is that if you want to get away from this problem, You have to spend a little dough. Last week I demoed a KVM IP device. It hooked directly up to a KVM switch and converted its Video, and PS/2 outputs to IP. We demoed this device over the internet. We have DSL connection. I was impressed with the speed. I've tested other digital kvm boxes and were never impressed with speed. This device was amazing. However it was also 3k so you can get amazing stuff when you invest in good product.

    Sean:
    While trying to get away from OS/2 on a PIII and get Linux installed on a dual boot P4 I got a Linksys dual-port KVM and it worked flawlessly. Still does.

    Sean:
    On Friday 14 February 2003 12:27 am, cfowler wrote: > This is mainly due to keyboard emulation issues. If you have 4 machines
    > and the power goes off you may have problems booting back up. The main
    > reason is the fact that even those devices support emulation, they can
    > not service more than say 2 systems at a time with that emulation. So
    > if all 4 machines look for keyboard at once then the Belkin may have
    > issues servicing them at once.

    This is easily solved by setting the BIOS on the machines so that they stay OFF following power loss. Let them boot one at a time. It's a lot less expensive than a high-end KVM.

    David:
    > I find the 2 port switches significantly more convienient to use.****
    > The 4 ports are much less convenient.

    What's less convenient about them? It's the same number of keystrokes to switch between any computer....

    Matt:
    I think he's referring to some switches that basically only have a "next" function where you press a button to go from PC 2 to PC 3, but if you want to go from PC 2 to PC 1, you have to press it 3 times, and usually wait a little bit inbetween presses.

    I saw an ad for a 2-port kvm switch that consisted of nothing more than a y-cable (http://www.ecost.com/ecost/shop/detail.asp?dpno=554209)... all of the switching logic was built into a block in the cable where the ends meet.. pretty low-profile.

    Geoffrey:
    I don't understand either. My linksys has a single button for each of the four computers. It also supports keyboard shortcuts and will cycle through each of the connected machines. I don't know what more you could want.

    Geoffrey:
    > I think he's referring to some switches that basically only have a "next"
    > function***

    Gotcha. Well, as I noted my linksys had a button for each computer, one push and you're there. Further keyboard shortcuts that would send you to which ever machine you wanted as well.

    Stephan:
    If you have a high end monitor and if you use a high pixel rate your image might degrade if you route the signal through a kvm.

    With one of my video cards the signal would even reflect from the kvm back to video card and back to the kvm causing a shadow.

    Using the pixel offset of the shadow, the pixel clock and the light speed value I could calculate the cable length between video card and kvm.

    Not really useful so I dismantled my physics project.

    Joe:
    Don't get a cheap one. I made that mistake and fried the power supply in one of my boxes. I don't know what the technospeak term is, but you need one that will provide the proper kbd and mouse electrical characteristics even when the switch is switched away from a particular machine.

    Geoffrey:
    > Don't get a cheap one. ****

    Correct. What the kvm does is make each machine see a mouse/keyboard whether or not it's the selected one. If it doesn't do this properly, ps2 mice get lost. In both X and windows when you return, the mouse will be lost. Serial mice are more forgiving, or should I say the serial port is.

    Michael:
    With my Linksys 2 port I just tap the Control key twice to switch. When I had a Linsys 4 port it was some sctrange control-something followed by the number I want to switch to. So I actually have to think about which screen I want to change to and remember the proper key combination.

    Same thing with my Belkin 4 port. I need to scrolllock-scrolllock-n when n is 1, 2, 3, or 4. I need to know where I'm going. I often get it wrong. But I never get it wrong with the 2 port linksys and it is faster, too.

    Synco:
    actually, 2-port kvm switches were a lot cheaper than switches with 4 ports and they seem to get exponentially more expensive... try to price a nice 10-port one. i don't really understand why they're so expensive... i could probably make one from radio shack parts for about $30, but it would be ass ugly.

    i have the same problem... keep getting new machines, but i've found the best way (for me anyway) is to just boot them from the network and load the root fs from NFS... then i can ssh/rsh to any of the machines on my lan easily... that also gives you some flexibility as far as what you'll be using the machines for.

    for instance, to run your distributed processing cluster, you could load a certain NFS root, but if you wanted your machines to do their normal everyday jobs, they could load their own individual or group-based NFS root. of course this can all be done from a single machine. kvm switches don't give you that kind of flexibility.

    just a kvm-switch alternative for those of you as broke as me.

    Greg:
    Try buying the old mechanical KVM switches (4 port) for about $10.00 . If needed, you can buy any adapters for the back for about $1.50/ea. Total price:$16.00 . That is what I did for my last one KVM switch. Works fine with RH Linux and OpenBSD.

    2002

    Jeff:
    At this point, Cybex is the only KVM switch I'll buy

    Geoffrey:
    I've had a linksys kvm which I've used for about 4 years now. It's worked with everything. It's connected to my viewsonic monitor, linux cool keyboard and logitech wheeled mouse. All works well, although all that's connected to it now is Linux.

    Jeff:
    Last place I worked, I requested a Cybex KVM switch for a new server rack; "Batman and Robin" bought me a Belkin instead. The machines - a mixture of Compaq Deskpros and Dell Poweredges - wouldn't all boot up properly when they weren't selected. I told the Dynamic Duo to get my a frickin' Cybex. They sent me a Belkin;[Oops, I meant to say that they sent me a Linksys the second time.] same issues. I sent it back to the Caped Crusaders and FINALLY they sent me the Cybex I'd originally asked for. No issues and no problems.

    Some years prior after I had bought a Cybex at work, I found I had a problem with an IBM PS/2 Model 80 and the keyboard. Cybex sent me an adapter box (at no cost) that corrected an issue with original PS/2s and I was in business.

    2001

    Joe:
    Displaying my ignorance... again...

    Today I got a 4-port KVM switch. It doesn't have a keyboard emulation circuit; the instructions said, "unplug the keyboard from your computer and plug it back in; if the machine still responds to the keyboard then it will work with this switch." So I did that (thinking even at the time that I'd heard somewhere it wasn't a good idea, but what the hell, I'm following instructions, right?) And the instant I pulled the keyboard connector out the machine died - powered off. And wouldn't power on again. Power supply is dead. (Amazingly enough, the motherboard is uninjured - moved it to another case and it booted fine.)

    So is this behavior I should have expected? I'm very hesitant to try using the KVM switch with any of my machines now, since switching machines is the moral (and electrical) equivalent of unplugging the keybord. Incidentally, it was an AT keyboard connector, on an AT motherboard, if that matters.

    Jenn:
    <putting on tech hat...oooh...dusty>
    AT motherboards in general respond very poorly to having their keyboards removed while powered on. ATX, as far as I know, doesn't have this problem. That being said, I've never had a problem with AT machines on a non-intelligent switch...

    Here's the dance I go thru, without any ill effects (AT and ATX, Belkin OmniCube KVM and some old ABCD rotating dial KVM)...

    1. select port 1 on KVM
    2. power on machine attached to port 1
    3. wait for POST to detect keyboard...or get all the way to a prompt and log in if you're paranoid
    4. switch to port 2 on KVM
    5. power on machine attached to port 2
    shake, stir, repeat

    Once everything is booted and humming along, you should be able to switch between them with no problems. It's not exactly the same thing as yanking the cable from the back of the computer.

    Short answer: power dying is a lucky (because it should've been your motherboard) but expected consequence of removing the keyboard cable from the AT motherboard, so don't do it again. wink As long as you don't yank the cable out, you should be able to switch to your heart's content. And I think I may have some spare AT motherboards lying around if my advice causes a catastrophic loss....... wink

    Geoffrey:
    I've gone the route with these switches and I'll say that if you want to do this, you should get one of the more expensive ones that contain electronics that 'fools' the machine into thinking it's still connected. I've got a 4 port Linksys that I've been using for about 4 years now. I don't remember how much it was, but I'm pretty sure it's in the $70-$100 range. They are pricing, but the bloody work and they don't wear out. I had a couple of mechanical switches before this, and they all got flaky after a while.

    I've never heard or experienced the problem you've outlined below though. I have had my switch loose power and when it does, the mouse and keyboard would not respond. If I switched from one machine to another, I'd get the keyboard back, but the mouse would not return (that's in X) so I would end up having to restart X.

    By the way, the linksys switch I have controls the monitor, keyboard and mouse. It enables you to switch from one machine to another via buttons on the front of the switch as well as a set of key sequences. It also has a mode where it will rotate through all systems it's connected to. Seems like something you might use for a security system, but not something I ever take advantage of. They also make larger switches, I think up to 7 or 8 boxes.

    Greg:
    To put in my 2 cents worth, I would heartily suggest what "Wandered Inn" said about getting the good stuff. My company (total MS shop) has had an ongoing problem w/ KVM's that lose the mouse connection. That seems to be the rule in my experience regardless of p.c. or os that is used. Like jenn said I religiously log in before I ever switch, otherwise the p.c. doesn't seem to pick up a component. My LinkSys ProConnect 4 port does that and so I just live with 4 mice on my desk (at least until I get my rack up tomorrow).. and 2 at work (one for my Linux box and the other for the NT 2000 box), but the monitor and keyboards seem to work fine. What they are using at work are Masterviews and can be had at Cyberguys 1.800.892.1010 or www.cyberguys.com . Mine and just about all that I see have ports for both AT and the PS/2 connections. I would also recommend one that comes with some type of switching the power over "gently". Some come with cables or you can get them at Office Depot or anywhere else. The sysadmins at work swear that they work, but I haven't been in the server room in a while, so I can't personally support that claim.

    Geoffrey:
    Let me get this right. You lose your mouse when you switch your proconnect? That's the same box I've got and I've never lost the mouse, unless the proconnect looses power. I've run both ps2 and serial mice to this thing. Once even ran the ps2 from the computer to the serial of the proconnect and that worked.

    Jeff:
    In response to my request for a Cybex KVM switch, our IT people bought me first a Belkin and then a Linksys switch. Neither handled the machines I connected it to correctly - Dell PowerEdge severs. I finally put my footdown and insisted on the Cyber 8-port and finally, joy was achieved, as I knew it would be.

    In an earlier experience, Cybex sent me a special adapter to permit proper operation with an IBM PS/2 system, free of charge. I've never forgotten that, and I honor them with my continued patronage.

    Joe:
    Thanks for the advices, everyone. I got this KVM on eBay for $30, including a complete set of cables, and I'm not all that interested in upgrading to something less cheesy. I'll probably just keep a keyboard per machine; it was moving the monitor around that was really driving me up the wall, anyhow.

    2000

    Nicodemus:
    I'm running RedHat 5.2 on a P133 with a serial mouse and Windows 98 on a PIII/550 with a PS/2 mouse. I have a 4-port KVM switch that I'm using and everything works fine except for the mouse.

    I have a Logitech Trackball that runs fine for the Windows machine, but I can't get it to work with my Linux box. I've tried running mouseconfig and selecting a variety of different types and nothing has worked. It's not that big a deal having to use two mice. The main reason for the KVM was the keyboard and monitor, but it sure would be nice to use the trackball I'm in love with on my Linux box.

    Does anyone have any ideas how I can remedy this situation?

    Geoffrey:
    First of all, you've got Linux on the wrong machine. smile

    Have you tried this mouse connected directly to your Linux box? (that is, ruled out the possibility that it's the switch box that's the problem...)

    Patrick:
    Are you booting with the switch turned to each machine as it boots? Most switches will not send ps2 or serial sigs to the machines unless there is a physical connection.

    Boot one box with the switch turned to it, the mouse should work.

    switch boxes, boot up and that mouse should work... If you can't get this far, the the switch or the mouse is bad.

    otherwise you should now be able to switch between the two.

    Marc:
    If you have a 'hard' switchbox not a electronic one this is most likely your problem. Even amongst the electronic ones you get what you pay for, be careful. (1.)

    Also if your switch has ports for both PS/2 and Serial mice it will normally only support 4 of one type or the other, you cannot mix-n-match amoung the servers.(2)

    If I have to have them, I only use Rartians - never had a problem with them. If you do have a 'hard' switch and no budget to buy a really good one Rartian sells a 'dongle' with KB and M leads that you can plug into the back of your server. It provides the heartbeat to the ports so everything will work and you can hotplug KB and Mice into the dongle.(3)

    The dongles arn't nearly as expensive and much cheaper then a hung server wink

    Geoffrey:
    (1.)This is true, my box was relatively expensive, requires it's own power and has cute little leds telling you the state of each machine. A few other bells/whistles as well.

    (2)This does not apply to the box I have. It has both ps/2 and serial mouse ports of which I've mixed and match with no problems.

    (3)Mine's a linksys, and I've never had a problem with it. I went through about 5 of the cheap boxes before I got this one.

    Geoffrey:
    Patrick wrote:
    > Are you booting with the switch turned to each machine as it boots? Most
    > switches will not send ps2 or serial sigs to the machines unless there is a
    > physical connection.

    This depends on the switch. I've got a 4 way switch that makes it look like (to the machine) that there is a keyboard and mouse attached regardless of the position of the switch. I can boot any one of them while my switch is set to any other. Depends on how smart the switch is (generally reflected in the price as well). You probably don't want to be changing the switch in mid boot regardless of the switch.

    > Boot one box with the switch turned to it, the mouse should work.

    This might help determine how smart the switch is. If it does work, the switch is not that smart. If it doesn't work, you've really not learned anything yet. smile

-- GradyHarris - 18 Feb 2003


I Attachment Action Size Date WhoSorted ascending Comment
scanFilesEXT scanFiles manage 5 K 12 November 2001 CharlesShapiro Perl script to scan for windows shares
Topic revision: r8 - 17 December 2009, willyonwheels
This site is powered by FoswikiCopyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding Foswiki? Send feedback